home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
Text File | 1992-11-30 | 32.2 KB | 1,176 lines |
-
- ORDER LIST
-
- MONDAY, NOVEMBER 30, 1992
-
-
-
- CERTIORARI -- SUMMARY DISPOSITION
-
- 91-1766 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY, CA V. UNITED STATES, ET AL.
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
-
- The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the
-
- United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for
-
- further consideration in light of Church of Scientology
-
- v. United States, 506 U. S. (1992).
-
-
-
- ORDERS IN PENDING CASES
-
-
- No. ANTHONY N. ANGELETAKIS V. CALIFORNIA
-
- The motion for leave to proceed in forma
-
- pauperis without an affidavit of indigency executed
-
- by the petitioner is granted.
-
- No. ELIUS LAMAR REED V. AMAX COAL COMPANY
-
- The motion to direct the Clerk to file a
-
- petition for writ of certiorari, out-of-time, is denied.
-
- No. ERMA W. FOLEY V. LOUIS W. SULLIVAN, SECRETARY OF
- HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
-
- The motion to direct the Clerk to file a
-
- petition for writ of certiorari, out-of-time, is denied.
-
- D-1147 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JEFFREY MICHAEL LEBEN
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Jeffrey
-
- Michael Leben, of Yorktown Heights, New York, has
-
- resigned from the practice of law before the Appellate
-
- Division, Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial
-
- Department and this Court by order of August 18, 1992,
-
- having suspended the said Jeffrey Michael Leben from the
-
- practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule
-
- issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Jeffrey Michael Leben
-
- be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
-
- D-1151 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF HARVIN COOPER MOORE, III
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Harvin
-
- Cooper Moore, III, of Houston, Texas, has resigned from
-
- the practice of law before the Supreme Court of Texas
-
- and this Court by order of September 4, 1992, having
-
- suspended the said Harvin Cooper Moore, III, from the
-
- practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule
-
- issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Harvin Cooper Moore,
-
- III, be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court
-
- and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1157 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF EDWARD HORN
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Edward
-
- Horn, of Brooklyn, New York, has been disbarred from the
-
- practice of law by the Appellate Division, Supreme Court
-
- of New York, Second Judicial Department, and this Court by
-
- order of September 4, 1992, having suspended the said
-
- Edward Horn from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause
-
- why he should not be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly
-
- issued;
-
- It is ordered that the said Edward Horn be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
-
- D-1158 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JULES V. SPECINER
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Jules V.
-
- Speciner, of Great Neck, New York, has been disbarred
-
- from the practice of law by the Appellate Division,
-
- Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department,
-
- and this Court by order of September 4, 1992, having
-
- suspended the said Jules V. Speciner from the practice
-
- of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue
-
- requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Jules V. Speciner be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1173 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF STEVEN J. ROMER
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Steven J.
-
- Romer, of Fishkill, New York, has been disbarred from
-
- the practice of law by the Appellate Division, Supreme
-
- Court of New York, First Judicial Department, and this
-
- Court by order of October 13, 1992, having suspended the
-
- said Steven J. Romer from the practice of law in this
-
- Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to
-
- show cause why he should not be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that a response has
-
- been filed;
-
- It is ordered that the said Steven J. Romer be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
-
- D-1187 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF TIMOTHY FRANCIS O'LEARY
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Timothy
-
- Francis O'Leary, of Melrose, Massachusetts, has been
-
- disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme
-
- Judicial Court of Massachusetts and this Court by order
-
- of October 19, 1992, having suspended the said Timothy
-
- Francis O'Leary from the practice of law in this Court
-
- and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show
-
- cause why he should not be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Timothy Francis O'Leary
-
- be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1208 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF HENRY MURRY BEATY, JR.
-
- It is ordered that Henry Murry Beaty, Jr., of
-
- Memphis, Tennessee, be suspended from the practice of
-
- law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable
-
- within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he
-
- should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this
-
- Court.
-
- D-1209 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JAMES JUDSON WHITE, III
-
- It is ordered that James Judson White, III, of
-
- Chestertown, Maryland, be suspended from the practice of
-
- law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable
-
- within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he
-
- should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this
-
- Court.
-
- D-1210 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF BARBARA L. WOLF
-
- It is ordered that Barbara L. Wolf, of Fort
-
- Lauderdale, Florida, be suspended from the practice of
-
- law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable
-
- within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he
-
- should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this
-
- Court.
-
- D-1211 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF CRAIG ALAN McCLEAN
-
- It is ordered that Craig Alan McClean, of
-
- Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, be suspended from the practice
-
- of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable
-
- within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he
-
- should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this
-
- Court.
-
- D-1212 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF HUMBERTO JUAN AGUILAR
-
- It is ordered that Humberto Juan Aguilar, of Miami,
-
- Florida, be suspended from the practice of law in this
-
- Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty
-
- days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1213 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DAVID MARK VERIZZO
-
- It is ordered that David Mark Verizzo, of Miami,
-
- Florida, be suspended from the practice of law in this
-
- Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty
-
- days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1214 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF STEPHEN ROBERT BODELL
-
- It is ordered that Stephen Robert Bodell, of
-
- Wickliffe, Kentucky, be suspended from the practice of
-
- law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable
-
- within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he
-
- should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this
-
- Court.
-
- D-1215 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MARTIN J. MAYBLUM
-
- It is ordered that Martin J. Mayblum, of Forest
-
- Hills, New York, be suspended from the practice of law
-
- in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within
-
- forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should
-
- not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- 108 ORIG. NEBRASKA V. WYOMING
-
- The motion of the Special Master for compensation
-
- and reimbursement of expenses is granted and it is ordered
-
- that the Special Master is awarded a total of $124,171.27
-
- for the period March 1, 1992 through October 15, 1992 to
-
- be paid as follows: 20% by the United States and 40% each
-
- by Nebraska and Wyoming.
-
- 109 ORIG. OKLAHOMA AND TEXAS V. NEW MEXICO
-
- The motion of the Special Master for compensation
-
- and reimbursement of expenses is granted and it is
-
- ordered that the Special Master is awarded a total of
-
- $64,112.96 for the period November 1, 1991 through
-
- September 23, 1992 to be paid as follows: to be paid
-
- equally by the parties.
-
- 91-8581 McDONALD, JESSIE D. V. YELLOW CAB METRO, INC.
-
- The motion of petitioner for reconsideration of
-
- order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis is
-
- denied.
-
- 92-65 SUN CARRIERS, INC., ET AL. V. MILNE EMPLOYS. ASSN., ET AL.
-
- The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in
-
- this case expressing the views of the United States.
-
- 92-344 McNARY, COMMR., INS, ET AL. V. HAITIAN CTRS. COUNCIL
-
- The motion of respondents to suspend briefing is
-
- denied. Justice Blackmun and Justice Souter would grant
-
- this motion.
-
- 92-5129 SULLIVAN, JOHN V. LOUISIANA
-
- The motion for appointment of counsel is granted
-
- and it is ordered that John W. Reed, Esquire, of New
-
- Orleans, Louisiana, is appointed to serve as counsel for
-
- the petitioner in this case.
-
- 92-5205 SCHULTZ, DARYL, ET UX. V. PARR ELEVATOR, INC.
-
- The motion of petitioners for reconsideration of
-
- order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis is
-
- denied.
-
-
-
- 92-5769 HOWARD, G. R. V. DEPT. OF LABOR, ET AL.
-
- The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until
-
- December 21, 1992, within which to pay the docketing fee
-
- required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in
-
- compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court.
-
- 92-5973 DEMOS, JOHN R. V. KING CTY. SUP. COURT, ET AL.
-
- The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis is denied. See Rule 39.8. Petitioner is
-
- allowed until December 21, 1992, within which to pay the
-
- docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a
-
- petition in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this
-
- Court. Justice Blackmun and Justice Stevens would deny
-
- the petition for a writ of certiorari.
-
- 92-6082 SINDRAM, MICHAEL J. V. VIRGINIA
-
- The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis is denied. See Rule 39.8. Petitioner is
-
- allowed until December 21, 1992, within which to pay the
-
- docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a
-
- petition in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this
-
- Court. Justice Blackmun and Justice Stevens would deny
-
- the petition for a writ of certiorari.
-
-
-
- CERTIORARI GRANTED
-
-
- 92-311 SULLIVAN, SEC., H&HS V. SCHAEFER, RICHARD H.
-
-
-
- 92-603 FCC, ET AL. V. BEACH COMMUNICATIONS, ET AL.
-
- The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.
-
- 92-479 TXO PRODUCTION CORP. V. ALLIANCE RESOURCES, ET AL.
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted
-
- limited to Questions 1 and 2 presented by the petition.
-
-
- CERTIORARI DENIED
-
-
- 91-8198 VUONG, HAI HAI V. TEXAS
-
- 91-8349 WILLIAMS, XAVIER V. CHRANS, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- 91-8643 KWEKU, DOUGLAS V. INS
-
- 92-115 ) FISCHER, EUGENE A. V. UNITED STATES
- )
- 92-177 ) KRAMER, BENJAMIN, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
- )
- 92-235 ) BELL, KAY V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-279 MOBLEY, GERALD I. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-302 BLAKE, PETER V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-308 DOE, JOHN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-317 VICARIA, CARLOS C. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-336 LETKE, KIMBERLY V. VLACHOS, CONSTANDENO, ET AL.
-
- 92-369 MILLBROOK, THEODIS V. SULLIVAN, SEC. OF H&HS
-
- 92-380 ARKANSAS V. BUTLER, LARRY K.
-
- 92-382 ARDITTI, VICTOR V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-383 GORRELL, GREGORY R. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-387 STEWART CTY. TENNESSEE V. HEFLIN, ALLEN D., ET AL.
-
- 92-400 LINCOLN LOG HOMES, INC. V. ZONA, STANLEY, ET UX.
-
- 92-415 GULF CONTRACTING, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-420 RIVERBEND FARMS, ET AL. V. MADIGAN, SEC. OF AGRICULTURE
-
- 92-432 GIFFORD, DICK V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-438 DOW CHEM. CO., ET AL. V. BROWN, CHARLES, ET AL.
-
- 92-463 UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY, ET AL V. CUOMO, GOV. OF NY, ET AL.
-
- 92-554 FLEENOR, JAMES, ET AL. V. BHD. OF LOCOMO. ENGRS, ET AL
-
- 92-555 PAUL, WILLIAM V. MISSOURI PACIFIC RR. CO.
-
- 92-560 ) MANHATTAN BEACH, ET AL. V. BUCKEY, PEGGY McMARTIN
- )
- 92-628 ) CHILDREN'S INST., ET AL. V. BUCKEY, PEGGY McMARTIN
-
- 92-565 BAGGEN TUG & BARGE, ET AL. V. RAINIER NATIONAL BANK
-
- 92-566 BARNES, MARK V. WESTINGHOUSE ELEC., ET AL.
-
- 92-572 SANTIKOS, GEORGE J. V. TEXAS
-
- 92-575 PARTINGTON, EARLE A., ET AL. V. LUM, HERMAN T. F., ET AL.
-
- 92-576 TV COMMUNICATIONS, ETC. V. TURNER NETWORK, ETC.
-
- 92-580 MARSHALL, LINDA, ET AL. V. BANKERS LIFE, ETC., ET AL.
-
- 92-582 PAUL, JODIE D. V. MOORE, EUGENE, ET UX.
-
- 92-587 HARRISON, CARLYLE L. V. MONTVERDE ACADEMY
-
- 92-589 R.E.J. vs. L.R.E.
-
- 92-594 PARTINGTON, EARLE, ET AL. V. KIBE, GERALD, ET AL.
-
- 92-596 LICHT, SEYMOUR V. TEXAS COMMERCE BANK, ET AL.
-
- 92-605 AMIRAULT, GERALD V. FAIR, COMMR. MA DOC
-
- 92-608 STANDRING, ROBERT V. XEROX CORP.
-
- 92-611 OLD BRIDGE CHEM., INC. V. NJ DEPT. OF ENVTL. PROTECT.
-
- 92-614 CSX TRANS., INC. V. BARKER, LEONARD, ET AL.
-
- 92-615 PACIFIC TELESIS, ET AL. V. TALKING YELLOW PAGES, INC.
-
- 92-616 SHARP, STEPHEN, ET UX. V. HENNEPIN COUNTY BUR., ET AL.
-
- 92-620 NELSON, REABE & SNYDER, INC. V. SELPH, BENJAMIN, ET AL.
-
- 92-622 ROBINS ISLAND PRESERV., ETC. V. SOUTHOLD DEVELOPMENT CORP.
-
- 92-623 RMI TITANIUM COMPANY V. OIL, CHEM. & ATOMIC, ET AL.
-
- 92-625 PLAISANCE, HENRY, ET UX. V. TEXACO, INC., ET AL.
-
- 92-627 CITY VENDING OF MUSKOGEE V. OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION
-
- 92-636 DILLNER, CONNIE V. SODEN, RICHARD
-
- 92-637 MUTUAL REINSURANCE BUREAU V. GREAT PLAINS MUTUAL INS. CO.
-
- 92-638 INTL. FUNDING INST., ET AL. V. FEC
-
- 92-651 WRIGHT, ROSS V. INDIANA
-
- 92-655 BARRON, TINA V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
-
- 92-657 KAUBLE, PHIL, ET AL. V. CONTINENTAL STEEL, ET AL.
-
- 92-660 SHOTEY, MICHAEL V. EALES, LINDA, ET AL.
-
- 92-670 PAZOS-SANTANA, CARLOS V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-675 HARMAN, JAMES V. WETZEL, ROGER
-
- 92-680 WOERNER, JEAN V. BRUNT, HARRY
-
- 92-698 BAGLEY, CHARLES V. PENNSYLVANIA
-
- 92-703 MacDONALD, JEFFREY V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-716 KAMIL, RACHEL V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-721 SEARS, WILLIAM V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-729 DOHERTY, PATRICK V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-5033 FETTERLY, DONALD K. V. IDAHO
-
- 92-5061 WEBB, MICHAEL J. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-5470 JOHNSON, DARRELL V. WHITLEY, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- 92-5485 PEREZ, DOMINGO V. ILLINOIS
-
- 92-5505 DEAN, THOMAS G. V. SMITH, ELLEN ET AL.
-
- 92-5529 SYROVATKA, JERRY V. CALIFORNIA
-
- 92-5542 HUDSON, ROBERT V. NEW YORK
-
- 92-5593 RAGOSTA, JOHN R. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-5692 JENKINS, ALVIN V. WISCONSIN
-
- 92-5700 MEZA-SANCHEZ, MARTIN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-5720 LONDONO, NESTER V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-5733 SCHMELTZER, ERNEST V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-5735 DROGE, WILLIAM V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-5737 AMARIGLIO, JACK V. US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
-
- 92-5940 ROSSI, RICHARD V. ARIZONA
-
- 92-5955 GORE, MARSHALL L. V. FLORIDA
-
- 92-5957 TURNER, TERRY M. V. SUMNER, DIR., PUBLIC SAFETY
-
- 92-5959 JOHNSON, TIMOTHY H. V. WHITLEY, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- 92-5964 BULLOCK, JARI V. THOMPSON, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- 92-5966 PITTS, COURTLAND C. V. REDMAN, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- 92-5968 WHITE, WILLIAM D. V. TEXAS
-
- 92-5975 MOORE, DAVID A. V. LEE, SUPT., CALEDONIA
-
- 92-5977 LANCASTER, RONALD D. V. VAN DER VEUR, WARDEN
-
- 92-5987 ROXAS, LEONILO M. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-5990 STOCKTON, DENNIS W. V. VIRGINIA, ET AL.
-
- 92-5996 SMITH, ANTHONY V. McCARTHY, RODNEY, ET AL.
-
- 92-6003 STACKHOUSE, WESLEY V. SCULLY, SUPT.
-
- 92-6004 JACKSON, DOUGLAS M. V. FLORIDA
-
- 92-6005 JACKSON, EDDIE V. LEONARDO, SUPT.
-
- 92-6011 VENTERS, KIRK V. BASHELOR, RONALD, ET AL.
-
- 92-6014 CHANCY, MAXI V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6017 ATTWELL, JOSEPH J. V. CLARK, LARRY L., ET AL.
-
- 92-6022 WRIGHT, PATRICK V. ILLINOIS
-
- 92-6023 SMITH, ARLETTA R. V. CITIZENS BANK OF MARYLAND
-
- 92-6024 WRIGHT, BETTY D. V. HOMESTAKE MINING CO.
-
- 92-6030 MILNER, LARRY D. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6038 HOLGUIN, RUDY V. DOE, JOHN, ET AL.
-
- 92-6052 HARRISON, FREDDIE L. V. ENRIGHT, JOHN R., ET AL.
-
- 92-6057 MEADOWS, CHARLES W. V. PITCHER, WARDEN
-
- 92-6064 DEVINE, THOMAS V. SULLIVAN, SUPT., ET AL.
-
- 92-6068 BUNDY, ANTONIO JAMES V. VAUGHN, SUPT., PA SCI, ET AL
-
- 92-6069 STEVE R. V. COMMR. OF SOC. SERVICES
-
- 92-6070 SHEARD, JOHN V. D'ALESSIO, THOMAS, ET AL.
-
- 92-6071 WHITAKER, MILTON V. LARSEN, C. D., ET AL.
-
- 92-6072 WILLIAMS, RONALD PATRICK V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6076 GYORE, JOZSEF V. O'CONNELL, JOSEPH S., ET AL.
-
- 92-6081 MALONE, EUGENE W. V. DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE
-
- 92-6086 BUTLER, WAYNE E. V. LOFTON, SUPT., ET AL.
-
- 92-6087 BRAYTON, ROSAMOND V. CONTRIBUTORY RETIREMENT
-
- 92-6088 VERDUGO, J. R. V. WORKERS' COMPENSATION
-
- 92-6090 KOYOMEJIAN, WANIS V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6094 BOBO, CLIFTON V. OHIO
-
- 92-6098 VAN NOTE, KENNETH V. RAFFERTY, DEP. DIR., NJ DOC
-
- 92-6099 SINDRAM, MICHAEL V. LORENZO, LAWRENCE, ET AL.
-
- 92-6102 SMITH, RONDA, ET VIR V. ADOPTIVE PARENTS
-
- 92-6107 WHITTED, MARTHA V. ORANGE COUNTY EMPLOYEES
-
- 92-6108 VILVERT, JOSEPH V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6109 GLASS, JAMES F. V. INDIANA
-
- 92-6118 WILSON, KENT V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6121 LEWIS, MARTIN E. V. RUSSE, HENRY P., ET AL.
-
- 92-6125 KENEALY, JOHN E. V. FRUEHAUF CORP., ET AL.
-
- 92-6126 HOWELL, SIMON V. DELAWARE
-
- 92-6128 KUKES, GARY E. V. RAMSEY, MICHAEL, ET AL.
-
- 92-6129 HUFFSMITH, DONALD V. MUSTO, JOSEPH, ET AL.
-
- 92-6133 SAWYERS, BRIAN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6135 TANGWALL, DONALD V. BOROCK, PAUL
-
- 92-6136 ROBINSON, MAUREEN V. NJ TURNPIKE AUTHORITY, ET AL
-
- 92-6140 PEREZ, AUGUSTINE V. HUTCHERSON, STEVE A., ET AL.
-
- 92-6142 BLAIR-BEY, JAMES, ET AL. V. NIX, WARDEN
-
- 92-6144 BLAIR, MILTON A. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6148 FERNANDEZ, STEPHEN R. V. WELLS, WARDEN
-
- 92-6152 OWEN, GERALD DAVID, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6153 YOUNG, DONALD ALLEN V. PASKETT, WARDEN
-
- 92-6154 BAKER, LEAVITT J. V. BANCROFT & MARTIN, ET AL.
-
- 92-6159 GARBETT, KERRICK M. V. MYERS, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- 92-6161 HENDERSON, ROBERT D. V. SINGLETARY, SEC., FL DOC
-
- 92-6162 ALEXANDER, SAMUEL V. COLLINS, DIR. TX DCJ
-
- 92-6164 PIERCE, ROY L. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6165 WILLIAMSON, JARVIS V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6167 MORAS-MORAQUEZ, ALDO RAMON V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6168 McCLEARY, AARON WAYNE V. COLLINS, DIR., TX DCJ
-
- 92-6169 TYLER, CLYDE V. T. PERRIN, ET AL.
-
- 92-6172 SINGLETON, JOHN V. TEXAS
-
- 92-6176 McCRAY, ROBERT HARLEY V. TEXAS
-
- 92-6177 CARBARCAS-A, LUIS V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6189 FERGUSON, SYLBOURNE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6200 KENNEDY, RONALD L. V. SHILLINGER, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- 92-6203 GARGALLO, MIGUEL A. V. MERRILL LYNCH, ETC., ET AL.
-
- 92-6206 FRIZZEL, STEVEN L. V. COLLINS, DIR., TEXAS DCJ
-
- 92-6210 McKOY, FREDERICK RAY V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6216 LUSTGARDEN, IRA D. V. GUNTER, EXECUTIVE DIR. DOC
-
- 92-6218 ATANASOFF, LJUBOMIR V. ARIZONA
-
- 92-6224 CALLIS, STANLEY JOSEPH V. MURRAY, DIR., VA DOC
-
- 92-6229 KEHNE, ROBERT C. V. ROLLINS, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- 92-6231 DOWTIN, LONZO V. TOOMBS, RAYMOND, WARDEN
-
- 92-6233 NICHOLSON, MARY V. FLORIDA
-
- 92-6238 MATHIS, ROBERT LEE V. FLORIDA
-
- 92-6240 MILLER, HINDA, ET VIR V. TUCKER, JOYCE E., ET AL.
-
- 92-6255 McCLUSKIE, DANNY V. MAINE
-
- 92-6293 BUTLER, SEAN B. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6294 BUSH, PHILLIP REESE V. LEGURSKY, WARDEN
-
- 92-6308 IMRAN, SYED S. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6309 ENNIS, EDWARD V. SCHUETZLE, WARDEN
-
- 92-6310 SOMES, MARK G. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6311 ) PAYNE, CHARLES C. V. UNITED STATES
- )
- 92-6320 ) JACKSON, OTIS, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6312 MOORE, PAUL A. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6319 ROUZARD, CANES V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6322 KULKOVIT, VIRA V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6324 PETERSON, LEE ROY V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6329 LUACES, GEORGE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6334 CONTI, FREDRICK M. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6341 DOE, JOHN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6342 CARTER, LYNETTE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6344 SIMPSON, ALFREDO V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6350 HAIRSTON, JIMMY L. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6351 O'NEIL, THOMAS LEE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6354 MAKI, JAMES CURTIS V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6356 TAPIA-FLORES, CIRO V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6359 AGIA, TAJUDEEN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6361 WEDDERBURN, LEROY V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6363 WALLACE, RONNY LEE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6364 ) BLALOCK, JACK V. UNITED STATES
- )
- 92-6365 ) BLALOCK, LILLIE MAE V. UNITED STATES
- )
- 92-6384 ) BRAWLEY, RICKY JENNINGS V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6367 JENKINS, JAMES C. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6368 LASTRA, JORGE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6369 MAXWELL, JOHN PAT V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6370 McCORMICK, WOODY HYATT V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6372 MENDOZA-VASQUEZ, EDUARDO V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6375 LANDRY, WALLACE JOSEPH V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6380 HOLLINGSWORTH, JACKIE D. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6395 BARRERA-DIAZ, FRANCISCO V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6396 SIMMONS, JAMES BURNELL V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6408 CHATMAN, JAMES V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6413 SWINNEY, LEVI, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6414 BURLEY, MICHAEL T. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6416 MARTIN, TROY V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6418 RODRIGUEZ, CLEMENTE RAMON V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6435 LIND, ROBERT V. NEW YORK
-
- The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.
-
- 91-1930 VASQUEZ, DANIEL, ET AL. V. THOMPSON, ROBERT J.
-
- The motion of Criminal Justice Legal Foundation for
-
- leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The
-
- motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma
-
- pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of
-
- certiorari is denied.
-
- 92-403 TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION 688 V. COCA-COLA BOTTLING
-
- 92-581 THOMAS, MARK, ET AL. V. WICHITA COCA-COLA, ETC.
-
- The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.
-
- Justice Blackmun took no part in the consideration or
-
- decision of these petitions.
-
- 92-508 MISSOURI V. HANKINS, RONALD
-
- 92-702 MISSOURI V. PARKER, VORNELL
-
- The motions of respondents for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis are granted. The petitions for writs of
-
- certiorari are denied.
-
- 92-557 CLARK, JAMES E. V. POULTON, ROBERT, ET AL.
-
- The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed
-
- further herein in forma pauperis is granted. The
-
- petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
-
- 92-558 VALENTEC KISCO, INC. V. WILLIAMS, JAMES
-
- 92-577 DOPYERA, EMIL, ET AL. V. TX ST. DEPT. HIGHWAYS, ETC.
-
- The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.
-
- Justice White would grant certiorari.
-
-
- 92-600 ADOPTIVE PARENTS OF M.N.M. vs. M.J.L.
-
- The motion of National Council for Adoption, et al.
-
- for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted.
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
-
- 92-626 CATERPILLAR INC. V. MICHIGAN DEPT. OF TREASURY
-
- The motion of Ashland Oil, Inc., et al. for leave
-
- to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. The petition
-
- for a writ of certiorari is denied.
-
- 92-656 HOLLYDAY, MARY JANE V. RAINEY, GENE, ET AL.
-
- The motion of Southern States Police Benevolent
-
- Association for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae
-
- is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is
-
- denied.
-
- 92-6015 MINCEY, BRYAN J. V. CALIFORNIA
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
-
- Justice Blackmun would grant certiorari.
-
-
-
-
- HABEAS CORPUS DENIED
-
-
-
- 92-6393 IN RE JONATHAN DAVID BROWN
-
- 92-6452 IN RE WILLIAM E. HUTCHINGS von LUDWITZ
-
- The petitions for writs of habeas corpus are
-
- denied.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- MANDAMUS DENIED
-
-
- 92-6050 IN RE LYNN JOHNSTON
-
- 92-6080 IN RE THOMAS W. LAKE
-
- 92-6138 IN RE LAWRENCE LAVOLD
-
- 92-6166 IN RE HAROLD ASCH
-
- 92-6179 IN RE HENRY SANDERS
-
- 92-6192 IN RE RONALD WAITES
-
- The petitions for writs of mandamus are denied.
-
-
-
-
- REHEARINGS DENIED
-
-
-
- 91-1702 CORTEZ, CARL W. V. FIRST CITY NAT. BANK, ET AL.
-
- 91-1784 PRINCE, GUY V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-1799 PACYNA, CLEMENT J. V. MARSH, SEC. OF ARMY
-
- 91-1847 MILLER, MAYNARD B. V. BRIGGS, ROBERT, ET UX.
-
- 91-2002 U.E. ENTERPRISES, ET AL. V. NEW YORK CHINESE TV, ETC.
-
- 91-7408 RICH, ROBERT, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7563 SHIIMI, HERMUNTH V. HARLANDALE INDEPENDENT SCH.
-
- 91-7697 BROWN, DEBRA D. V. INDIANA
-
- 91-7760 CROWLEY, ROBERT J. V. PRINCE GEORGE'S CTY., MD
-
- 91-7797 BOYLES, ANDREW V. INDIANA
-
- 91-8108 MASAT, KENNETH J. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-8238 SHUMATE, JOSEPH V. NCNB FINANCIAL SERVICES
-
- 91-8283 MEDERS, JIMMY F. V. GEORGIA
-
- 91-8303 FANNY, DANIEL V. LEVY, PAUL, ET AL.
-
- 91-8317 TODD, WILLIAM L. V. GEORGIA
-
- 91-8334 MOODY, JOHN G. V. TEXAS
-
- 91-8335 CARTER, CHARLES E. V. HARFORD CTY. CIRC. CT.
-
- 91-8353 TUDOROV, MARIA V. COLLAZO, LUCIA
-
- 91-8376 JUNGBLUT, EDWARD L. V. CRIST, WARDEN
-
- 91-8378 JACOBS, MARIA, ET AL. V. DUJMOVIC, MARK, ET AL.
-
- 91-8387 ASHMUS, TROY A. V. CALIFORNIA
-
- 91-8395 SLEDGE, CURTIS L. V. MEYERS, WARDEN
-
- 91-8404 JONES, ROBERT V. LEWIS, JAMES E., ET AL.
-
- 91-8405 EDWARDS, THOMAS F. V. CALIFORNIA
-
- 91-8429 JACKSON, CLARENCE B. V. SOUTH TEXAS COLLEGE, ET AL.
-
- 91-8487 FROST, SHAWN D. V. OHIO
-
- 91-8572 CALDWELL, BEULAH M. V. TOM MISTICK & SONS, ET AL.
-
- 91-8618 SAYLOR, ROBERT L. V. VIRGINIA
-
- 91-8638 HAWKINS, JAMES D. V. CALIFORNIA
-
- 91-8684 BENNETT, RONALD B. V. DIR., VIRGINIA DOC
-
- 91-8726 GORDON, RONALD L. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-8732 IN RE IDA JACKSON
-
- 91-8738 BAUER, FREDERICK W. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-38 CHRYSLER CORP. V. INTL. UNION, ALLIED INDUST.
-
- 92-48 FERMIN, FREDERICK V. OPM
-
- 92-59 IN RE HENRY ANDERSON
-
- 92-186 BARBER, CATHERINE V. SOMERVILLE HOSPITAL, ET AL.
-
- 92-241 CRAWFORD, HELON, ET VIR V. LEAHY, WILLIAM, ET AL.
-
- 92-248 MOZEE, WILLIAM O., ET AL. V. AM. COMMERCIAL MARINE, ETC.
-
- 92-257 CLARKE, ROBERT A. V. BUTCHER, HOWARD, ET AL.
-
- 92-5052 DIAZ, RUBEN S. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-5098 BANKS, ALFRED V. KAYE, STUART M.
-
- 92-5111 RUB, DUANE V. FEDERAL LAND BANK
-
- 92-5118 QAHDAFI, QUSAN A. V. VIRGINIA
-
- 92-5123 WILLE, JOHN F. V. LOUISIANA
-
- 92-5246 JOHNSON, FRANK C. V. SULLIVAN, SEC., H&HS, ET AL.
-
- 92-5263 DAWN, E. CHRISTMAN, ET UX. V. MARGOLIS, ALBERT, ET AL.
-
- 92-5289 LAWRENCE, MARION L. V. BRADY, SEC. OF TREASURY
-
- 92-5301 KIRIENKO, YURIY V. KIRIENKO, SARAJANE
-
- 92-5375 VISCIOTTI, JOHN LOUIS V. CALIFORNIA
-
- 92-5378 WILEY, HENRY V. CORRECTIONS CABINET OF KY
-
- 92-5382 SPIVEY, MICHAEL V. BRICE-WELLINGTON, JANICE
-
- 92-5389 WHITTLESEY, MICHAEL V. MARYLAND
-
- 92-5450 OMOIKE, ISAAC I. V. EXXON COMPANY
-
- 92-5550 BARSTEN, DENNIS V. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
-
- 92-5581 MITCHELL, EMMANUEL V. EBERHART, WARDEN
-
- 92-5586 TWYMAN, ROBERT V. ALABAMA
-
- 92-5605 WINTERS, CLYDE V. IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
-
- 92-5650 BEVERLY, RHONALD, ET UX. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-5681 KOT, JAMES G. V. PATERNOSTER, TONY, ET AL.
-
- The petitions for rehearing are denied.
-
- 91-1843 NELSON, JAMES D. V. UNIV. OF ALA. SYSTEM, ET AL.
-
- The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed
-
- further herein in forma pauperis is granted. The
-
- petition for rehearing is denied.
-
-
-
- 91-8615 TOLBERT, JESSE V. KEMP, EVAN
-
- The petition for rehearing is denied. Justice
-
- Thomas took no part in the consideration or decision of
-
- this petition.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- MOTIONS FOR ADMISSION
-
- The written motions for admission of the following
-
- lawyers to the Bar of this Court are granted:
-
-